Your Pension Will Not Fund Your Retirement

Your Pension Will Not Fund Your Retirement

 

Julius is 35 years old.  He has just started a new job and currently earns a monthly income of Shs 100, 000 per month.  Julius has never taken retirement savings seriously and has never contributed to any of his previous employers retirement schemes.  During induction to his new job, he was taken through the importance of retirement planning and has started getting interested in putting aside money for this eventuality. A huge motivating factor for Julius to register for the organisations retirement benefit scheme is that his employer will match his contribution up to a maximum of 10% of his income.  Julius starts contributing Kshs 10,000 a month towards this and his employer another Kshs 10, 000 per month.  Julius is happy to keep it at this level (a total of Shs 20, 000 per month) as this is the amount that he will receive a tax benefit on. He hopes to retire at the age of 60 (in 25 years).  Julius has done a rough calculation based on past performance of this particular pension fund. In 25 years, assuming his contribution remains the same, he will have put in a total of Kshs 6 million together with his employers contribution.  He expects his retirement savings to be worth Shs 25 million.  This is assuming that he never pulls out, the fund achieves on average a return of 10% p.a. and all the returns are re-invested. According to Julius this a lot of money and is enough to see him through his sunset years.  With 25 million shillings, he can live for over 20 years based on his current lifestyle. He figures he can now concentrate on other things such as educating his children, buying a home, enjoying his life, travelling etc.  That is exactly what Julius does.  After all, his retirement plan has been secured or has it?

 

Fast forward. Julius is 60 years old and his day of retirement has come.  A party is held for him at work and his achievements are recognised.  He goes to the home he has now finished paying off with a fat cheque of thirty five million shillings.  The investments in the pension fund did even better than he expected due to some bumper years on the stock market. He banks the money, settles into his retirement years with ease, and draws on the funds to sustain his lifestyle. Three years later, Julius is fat broke.  What happened?  Isn’t this the guy who walked away with millions?  Did he spend recklessly?  No he did not.  He just did not know what planning for retirement is.  The first mistake Julius made is thinking that he can forecast his retirement needs (25 years later) based on his current income.  Let’s even assume Julius maintains the same standard of expenses.  That is he continues to spend the equivalent of Shs 100, 000 per month today.  Well, there is still this animal called inflation. Assume inflation rate over the period is at 10% p.a.  It is currently a bit lower than this but let us be conservative.  That means a year later Julius’s lifestyle will be 10% more expensive.  In 25 years when he wants to retire his lifestyle will cost him over one million shillings a month. That is the figure he needed to have made his plans with from the beginning. So what seems like a huge amount of money to receive will in actual fact, sustain him at that lifestyle for 35 months. This is a very common mistake that people make when planning for retirement.  We have this animal called inflation and consequently the value of money today is not the same as it will be in the future. This is the primary reason why your pension fund is not going to be enough.  The second mistake that Julius made is putting the money in the bank and consuming it.  When you receive your pension fund, you cannot consume the capital or principal.  As we have seen with Julius, because of drawing on the funds, he really can’t live very long off them.  What Julius should have done is put the money where it can earn interest or income and then live off the income only.  That way the capital is preserved and therefore it’s ability to generate income continues.  For example if Julius put this money into a bond earning 10% p.a.  Each year, the bond will give an income of three and a half million shillings.  He needed to be disciplined enough to cut expenses and live off this money without touching the thirty five million.  You don’t know whether you will live another 20, 30 or 40 years post retirement so do not eat into your principal because when it is gone, what will you do?

 

We may have used estimates but many people face the above scenario. The last and most important mistake that Julius has made is the grave assumption that his pension fund would be the source of his retirement.  It may a part but it will only be a part.  Julius needed to have done other investments along the way.  Investments that would generate income to sustain the lifestyle he wanted to have at retirement.  In this example we assumed he maintained the same lifestyle but in reality expenses may change.  Remember, every time you increase the amount you currently spend on your lifestyle, it will mean a bigger retirement portfolio that you need to have.  Plan for it.  Your pension fund is not the sum total of your retirement plan.

 

 

Share This
  • albert

    thanks a lot for your piece of advice. hop to join your class in future.

  • Thks good lesson from my namesake in your article so long as inflation persists reservation for the same is essential that was an insightful

  • good document and it is informative, most
    of us need the content such as this much more,
    desire you could potentially discuss for you to us a lot more in relation to good informatif info.

  • Lydia

    Well said…..except for the fact that your analysis is based on the assumption that when Julius retires he takes home all his retirement savings, i.e as applied in provident funds. In a pension scheme, the retiree takes home a portion and retains the other in the Scheme where he’s paid a monthly pension, in most cases over a long period of time or for life. This then serves the purpose of income replacement at retirement. And that is why provident funds are globally discouraged and there’s move towards pension schemes. Our own scenario is the new NSSF which has now been converted to a pension scheme rather than a provident fund. (Please note there’s a huge difference between a pension scheme/fund and a provident fund. In Juius’s case, he is a member of a provident fund.